This site is intended for
US Healthcare Professionals only.

This site is intended for US Healthcare Professionals only.

Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Antitumor immune activity can also affect healthy cells

Tumor cells are mutated versions of normal cells—they have changed into tumor cells that now grow uncontrollably.1 To survive and reproduce, however, tumor cells still use some of the same processes as normal cells.2

Immuno-Oncology therapies activate the immune response to overcome tumor survival and growth strategies.3 This can enable the immune system to attack healthy cells along with tumor cells. These effects are known as immune-mediated adverse reactions.3


Immune cells and immune-mediated adverse reactions

The link between immune activation and immune-mediated adverse reactions is an area of ongoing research. The activation of certain immune cells has been associated with autoimmunity.4 This connection may influence the likelihood of an immune-mediated adverse reaction.5

  • T cells: T-cell activation has been linked to immune attack on normal cells and the development of autoimmunity.6 This may lead to immune-mediated adverse reactions in certain organ systems.3
  • Natural Killer (NK) cells: The potential link between NK cells and the development of immune-mediated adverse reactions is less clear. Studies have shown that NK cells may protect against autoimmunity.6-9

Activating and inhibitory pathways modulate immune-cell activation and the stimulation of an immune response.10,11 These pathways can vary in the intensity of their effect on immune activity.12 The dynamic expression of a receptor and its ligand can dictate the potency of a particular pathway in the immune response.12 The activation or inhibition of certain pathways has been associated with autoimmunity.12,13

Exploring the relationship between immune activation and autoimmunity may provide a better understanding of immune-mediated adverse reactions.


Managing complications of immune-mediated adverse reactions

Patients, caregivers, and physicians should be educated to remain vigilant throughout and after Immuno-Oncology treatment to minimize complications, some of which may be life threatening.3 In addition, treatment algorithms are available for use by healthcare providers to assist them in managing immune-mediated adverse reactions.14-16 Recent guidelines have been published that provide consensus recommendations for the management of immune-mediated adverse reactions.15,16 Specific guidance for managing immune-mediated adverse reactions for an individual product can be found in the accompanying FDA-approved prescribing information.

As research in immune-system activation advances and more data are made available, understanding and appropriate management of immune-mediated adverse reactions will evolve.17

References

1. Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science. 2015;348(6230):56-61. 2. Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD, Smyth MJl. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Ann Rev Immunol. 2011;29:235-271. 3. Amos SM, Duong CPM, Westwood JA, et al. Autoimmunity associated with immunotherapy of cancer. Blood. 2011;118(3):499-509. 4. Nishimura H, Okazaki T, Tanaka Y, et al. Autoimmune dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1 receptor-deficient mice. Science. 2001;291(5502):319-322. 5. Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature. 2011;480(7378):480-489. 6. Aramaki T, Ida H, Izumi Y, et al. A significantly impaired natural killer cell activity due to a low activity on a per-cell basis in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(3):245-252. 7. Fort MM, Leach MW, Rennick DM. A role for NK cells as regulators of CD4+ T cells in a transfer model of colitis. J Immunol. 1998 ;161(7):3256-3261. 8. Park YW, Kee SJ, Cho YN, et al. Impaired differentiation and cytotoxicity of natural killer cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(6):1753-1763. 9. Zhang B, Yamamura T, Kondo T, Fujiwara M, Tabira T. Regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by natural killer (NK) cells. J Exp Med. 1997;186(10):1677-1687. 10. Martinet L, Smyth MJ. Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:243-254. 11. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):252-264. 12. Anderson AC, Joller N, Kuchroo VK. Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: co-inhibitory receptors with specialized functions in immune regulation. Immunity. 2016;44(5):989-1004.
13. Liu J, Blake SJ, Harjunpää H, et al. Assessing immune-related adverse events of efficacious combination immunotherapies in preclinical models of cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76(18):5288-301. 14. Gelao L, Criscitiello C, Esposito A, Goldhirsch A, Curigliano G. Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer treatment: a double-edged sword cross-targeting the host as an “innocent bystander”. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6(3):914-933. 15. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385. 16. Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95. 17. Bertrand A, Kostine M, Barnetche T, Truchetet ME, Schaeverbeke T. Immune related adverse events associated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2015;13:211-224.

ONCUS1702354-03-01  03/18